Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.


 
HomeLatest imagesSearchRegisterLog in

 

 For water crossings, a tunnel is generally more costly to construct

Go down 
AuthorMessage
jancancook




Posts : 1136
Join date : 2011-01-02

For water crossings, a tunnel is generally more costly to construct  Empty
PostSubject: For water crossings, a tunnel is generally more costly to construct    For water crossings, a tunnel is generally more costly to construct  Icon_minitimeSun Mar 27, 2011 4:54 pm

For water crossings, a tunnel is generally more costly to construct than a bridge. Navigational considerations may limit the use of high bridges or drawbridge spans intersecting with shipping channels, necessitating a tunnel.

Bridges usually require a larger footprint on each shore than tunnels. There are actually more codes to follow with bridges than with tunnels. In areas with expensive real estate, such as Manhattan and urban Hong Kong, this is a strong factor in tunnels' favor. Boston's Big Dig project replaced elevated roadways with a tunnel system to increase traffic capacity, hide traffic, reclaim land, redecorate, and reunite the city with the waterfront.

Certified home inspector
nav jeevan hospital
Back to top Go down
 
For water crossings, a tunnel is generally more costly to construct
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Sub-surface water, or groundwater, is fresh water located in the pore
» Water supply systems get water from a variety of locations,
» Screwpile lighthouses were relatively inexpensive, easy to construct,
» The output of a particle accelerator can generally
» It is generally believed that the author of Acts

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 :: Community Discussion :: Gaming Chat-
Jump to: