Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.


 
HomeLatest imagesSearchRegisterLog in

 

 Although the arXiv is not peer reviewed, a collection

Go down 
AuthorMessage
jancancook




Posts : 1136
Join date : 2011-01-02

Although the arXiv is not peer reviewed, a collection Empty
PostSubject: Although the arXiv is not peer reviewed, a collection   Although the arXiv is not peer reviewed, a collection Icon_minitimeThu Nov 10, 2011 4:57 pm

Although the arXiv is not peer reviewed, a collection of moderators for each area review the submissions and may recategorize any that are deemed off-topic. The lists of moderators for many sections of the arXiv are publicly available[10] but moderators for most of the physics sections remain unlisted.
Additionally, an "endorsement" system was introduced in January 2004 as part of an effort to ensure content that is relevant and of interest to current research in the specified disciplines. The new system has attracted its own share of criticism for allegedly restricting inquiry. Under the system, an author must first get endorsed. Endorsement comes from either another arXiv author who is an endorser or is automatic, depending on various evolving criteria, which are not publicly spelled out. Endorsers are not asked to review the paper for errors, but to check if the paper is appropriate for the intended subject area. New authors from recognized academic institutions generally receive automatic endorsement, which in practice means that they do not need to deal with the endorsement system at all.


vanilla
information security
Back to top Go down
 
Although the arXiv is not peer reviewed, a collection
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» The lack of peer review, while a concern to some
» The arXiv was originally developed by Paul Ginsparg
» In an 1818 collection of his writings, the French liberal

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 :: Community Discussion :: Gaming Chat-
Jump to: